{"id":20002,"date":"2022-07-15T20:54:50","date_gmt":"2022-07-16T03:54:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/?p=20002"},"modified":"2022-07-15T20:54:50","modified_gmt":"2022-07-16T03:54:50","slug":"evidence-based-psychosocial-treatments-for-adolescents-with-disruptive-behavior","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/evidence-based-psychosocial-treatments-for-adolescents-with-disruptive-behavior\/","title":{"rendered":"Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents With Disruptive Behavior"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/15374416.2016.1146990?journalCode=hcap20\"><strong>Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents With Disruptive Behavior<\/strong><\/a> &#8211; This article updates the earlier reviews of evidence-based psychosocial treatments for disruptive behavior in adolescents (Brestan &amp; Eyberg, 1998; Eyberg, Nelson, &amp; Boggs, 2008), focusing primarily on the treatment literature published from 2007 to 2014. Studies were identified through an extensive literature search and evaluated using\u00a0<i>Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology<\/i>\u00a0(<i>JCCAP<\/i>) level of support criteria, which classify studies as\u00a0<i>well-established, probably efficacious, possibly efficacious, experimental<\/i>, or of\u00a0<i>questionable efficacy<\/i>\u00a0based on existing evidence. The\u00a0<i>JCCAP<\/i>\u00a0criteria have undergone modest changes in recent years. Thus, in addition to evaluating new studies from 2007 to 2014 for this update, all adolescent-focused articles that had been included in the 1998 and 2008 reviews were reexamined. In total, 86 empirical papers published over a 48-year period and covering 50 unique treatment protocols were identified and coded. Two multicomponent treatments that integrate strategies from family, behavioral, and cognitive-behavioral therapy met criteria as\u00a0<i>well-established<\/i>. Summaries are provided for those treatments, as well as for two additional multicomponent treatments and two cognitive-behavioral treatments that met criteria as\u00a0<i>probably efficacious<\/i>. Treatments designated as\u00a0<i>possibly efficacious, experimental<\/i>, or of\u00a0<i>questionable efficacy<\/i>\u00a0are listed. In addition, moderator\/mediator research is summarized. Results indicate that since the prior reviews, there has been a noteworthy expansion of research on treatments for adolescent disruptive behavior, particularly treatments that are multicomponent in nature. Despite these advances, more research is needed to address key gaps in the field. Implications of the findings for future science and clinical practice are discussed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents With Disruptive Behavior &#8211; This article updates the earlier reviews of evidence-based psychosocial treatments for disruptive behavior in adolescents (Brestan &amp; Eyberg, 1998; Eyberg, Nelson, &amp; Boggs, 2008), focusing primarily on the treatment literature published from 2007 to 2014. Studies were identified through an extensive literature search and evaluated using\u00a0Journal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[152],"tags":[143],"acf":[],"cp_meta_data":{"_edit_lock":["1657943558:2"],"_edit_last":["2"],"_fusion":["a:16:{s:25:\"show_first_featured_image\";s:3:\"yes\";s:4:\"fimg\";a:2:{s:5:\"width\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"height\";s:0:\"\";}s:17:\"post_links_target\";s:2:\"no\";s:7:\"bg_full\";s:2:\"no\";s:17:\"slider_visibility\";s:51:\"small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility\";s:12:\"main_padding\";a:2:{s:3:\"top\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"bottom\";s:0:\"\";}s:15:\"content_bg_full\";s:2:\"no\";s:20:\"image_rollover_icons\";s:7:\"default\";s:9:\"bg_repeat\";s:7:\"default\";s:11:\"slider_type\";s:2:\"no\";s:9:\"wooslider\";s:1:\"0\";s:19:\"blog_page_title_bar\";s:7:\"default\";s:17:\"content_bg_repeat\";s:7:\"default\";s:13:\"posts_sidebar\";s:15:\"default_sidebar\";s:15:\"posts_sidebar_2\";s:15:\"default_sidebar\";s:14:\"sidebar_sticky\";s:7:\"default\";}"],"_fusion_google_fonts":[""],"fusion_builder_status":[""],"elegant_typography":[""],"om_disable_all_campaigns":[""],"_cm_post_terms_2":[",143,"],"avada_post_views_count":["239"],"avada_today_post_views_count":["1"],"avada_post_views_count_today_date":["26-04-2024"]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20002"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unsilenced.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}